Contact

For collaboration, licensing, partnership, IP-related inquiries, or structured causality breakdown requests, please contact:

X / Twitter: @FalianWanlin

If your request concerns a formal review, collaboration proposal, research reference, or licensing discussion, please include relevant DOIs, links, project pages, or public records.

Causality Breakdown Requests
Falian’s Causal Seed Model v3.2

For case-based causality deconstruction, please use the structure below. Clear, organized submissions are reviewed first.

Notice: Causality breakdowns are for analytical, educational, and structural review purposes only. They are not legal advice, medical advice, therapy, crisis support, financial advice, or a substitute for professional services. Not all requests can be accommodated.

Suggested subject line:

Causality Breakdown | [Topic] | [Date]

A. Context: Position and Time

  1. Date(s) and location(s):
  2. People involved: roles only, no unnecessary private details
  3. What happened: maximum 5 bullet points

B. Choice

  1. What were the key decision points? List up to 3.
  2. At each point, what did you choose, and what alternatives existed?

C. Karma

  1. What actions were taken through body, speech, or mind?
  2. Which parts appear to be repeated patterns, and which parts appear to be one-time events?

D. Cause

  1. What earlier conditions made this outcome more likely? Consider habits, relationships, incentives, environment, timing, and repeated exposure.
  2. What seed appears to have been planted repeatedly?

E. Karmic System

  1. Which dimensions appear most relevant? Choose up to 2.

Good-Karma dimension
Bad-Karma dimension
Causality dimension
Collective-Karma dimension

  1. Who else’s actions, decisions, incentives, or system factors are coupled to this outcome?

F. Destiny

  1. What feels structurally constrained, repeated, or difficult to escape?
  2. What constraints are non-negotiable in the next 3 months?

G. Result

  1. What is the observable result right now? Facts only.
  2. What secondary results are emerging? Consider health, finance, trust, time, work, family, reputation, or safety.

H. Goal

  1. What outcome do you want? One sentence.
  2. What is the smallest acceptable improvement?

I. Boundaries

  1. What do you not want? State hard boundaries clearly.
  2. Are there any safety, legal, medical, financial, or privacy constraints?

Please do not submit confidential legal documents, medical records, private identification numbers, passwords, financial account information, or private details about third parties unless they are necessary and appropriate for review.

I respond to clear, structured submissions first.

For collaboration, licensing, and case-based causality deconstruction requests.
X / Twitter: @FalianWanlin
Request a Causality Breakdown (Falian’s Causal Seed Model v3.2)
Use the template below. X / Twitter: @FalianWanlin

Subject line (required):
Causality Breakdown — [Topic] — [Date]

A) Context (Position / Time)
1. Date(s) and location(s):
2. People involved (roles, not private details):
3. What happened (max 5 bullet points):

B) Choice
4. What were the key decision points? (list up to 3)
5. At each point: what did you choose, and what alternatives existed?

C) Karma
6. What actions were taken (body / speech / mind)?
7. Which part is repeated pattern vs one-time event?

D) Cause
8. What earlier conditions made this likely? (habits, relationships, incentives, environment)
9. What “seed” has been planted repeatedly?

E) Karmic System
10. Which dimension dominates? (choose up to 2)

  • Good-Karma dimension
  • Bad-Karma dimension
  • Causality dimension
  • Collective-Karma dimension

11. Who else’s actions/system factors are coupled to this outcome? (collective factors)

F) Destiny
12. What feels “scripted” or structurally constrained here?
13. What constraints are non-negotiable in the next 3 months?

G) Result (fruit)
14. What is the observable result right now? (facts only)
15. What secondary results are emerging (health, finance, trust, time)?

H) Your goal
16. What outcome do you want? (one sentence)
17. What is the smallest acceptable improvement?

I) Boundaries
18. What you do NOT want (hard boundaries):
19. Any safety constraints / legal constraints:

I respond to clear, structured submissions first.

If you are requesting collaboration or a formal review, include relevant DOIs or links.

Not all requests can be accommodated.